Who implemented WebMCP well

This corpus: 766 hosts measured, 1541 scans, 3 days (2026-08-29 to 2026-08-31) — drawn from reports people request on this site plus our own background crawl, appended and never edited. A scan runs in the background on an ongoing basis, so these figures — and the tables below — will have moved by the time you read this.

58 third-party, tool-bearing hosts — every one currently on record, under the 100-row cap this table enforces.

The operator's own sites

23 of the tool-bearing hosts scored on the current rule set are run by the people who publish this directory — this site itself, and its wider network of near-me directory sites (81 of them if every rule set the corpus has ever scored under is counted, not just the current one — see the note above the ranking). They are listed apart rather than ranked against the third-party sites above: staying out of that ranking is the only honest place for a site to be when its own operator is the one keeping score. Same columns, same figures, and the same marker on every row, in case a link brought you here directly.

Most tools, not the same question as best score

A site can register a dozen tools that are badly typed, undocumented and never called — plenty of tools is not the same claim as a tool an agent can actually use. This is a separate ranking, on tool count alone, among the same third-party hosts as the table above — the operator's own sites keep their tool counts visible in their own table, not folded into this one either.